UC Irvine
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
544  Hector Garcia SO 32:55
736  Izzak Mireles SR 33:16
1,052  Jon Rodriguez JR 33:42
1,246  Ashton Garcia SR 33:59
1,353  Ravi Sharma FR 34:07
1,741  Sam Ayala SO 34:41
2,354  Andrew Graciano JR 35:58
2,474  Kit Carter FR 36:19
National Rank #150 of 315
West Region Rank #21 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 66.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hector Garcia Izzak Mireles Jon Rodriguez Ashton Garcia Ravi Sharma Sam Ayala Andrew Graciano Kit Carter
UCR Invitational 09/16 1132 32:50 33:34 34:01 33:39 34:01 34:39 36:07 36:35
Mustang Challenge 09/30 1143 33:03 33:10 34:22 33:59 34:00 34:22 35:08 36:22
Big West Championship 10/28 1161 32:46 33:26 35:34 33:48 34:11 35:46 37:24 36:30
West Region Championships 11/10 1101 32:52 32:59 33:00 34:44 34:21 34:53 35:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.6 609 0.1 0.4 0.6 2.6 5.6 9.7 15.3 16.7 15.7 12.7 9.1 6.2 3.6 1.6 0.4 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hector Garcia 81.5
Izzak Mireles 100.3
Jon Rodriguez 124.8
Ashton Garcia 141.9
Ravi Sharma 148.7
Sam Ayala 177.9
Andrew Graciano 221.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.4% 0.4 13
14 0.6% 0.6 14
15 2.6% 2.6 15
16 5.6% 5.6 16
17 9.7% 9.7 17
18 15.3% 15.3 18
19 16.7% 16.7 19
20 15.7% 15.7 20
21 12.7% 12.7 21
22 9.1% 9.1 22
23 6.2% 6.2 23
24 3.6% 3.6 24
25 1.6% 1.6 25
26 0.4% 0.4 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0